PSM II — Practice Question

Aligning Scrum Team Formation with Agile Values for Success

Question

Which way of creating Scrum Teams is consistent with Scrum’s values? (choose the best answer)

Answer

  • C. Providing boundaries that help the members organize themselves into Scrum Teams.

Explanation

Forming Scrum teams in a way that aligns with Agile values is crucial for effective Scrum implementation. Self-organization, a core Scrum principle, allows teams to form based on mutual understanding and collaboration. By providing clear boundaries and organizational goals, leaders can empower teams to self-organize while ensuring alignment with the company's needs. This approach fosters a sense of ownership, accountability, and high performance – key ingredients for successful Scrum adoption. Understanding these principles is essential for passing the Professional Scrum Master II (PSM II) exam and guiding organizations in their Agile transformation.

Download 72 More PSM II Questions

Complete question set with detailed explanations for every answer. Real exam questions organized in PDF format.

$25
Download PDF

Instant download • Clear explanations • Organized format

Show Detailed Analysis
Creating Scrum Teams in a manner consistent with Scrum’s values emphasizes self-organization and collaboration. Option C, which suggests providing boundaries that help members organize themselves into Scrum Teams, is aligned with Scrum principles. This approach encourages team autonomy within a framework, allowing teams to flourish while adhering to Scrum practices. Scrum’s values, such as courage, focus, commitment, respect, and openness, are essential in fostering an environment where Scrum Teams can self-manage effectively. Each team member has the responsibility to collaborate and contribute, leading to enhanced productivity and innovation. In contrast, options that impose rigid structures or dictate team composition undermine these values by restricting self-organization and reducing the potential for creativity and engagement within the team.
Why Other Options Are Wrong
{'option_a': 'Dictating team composition from the top down limits the team’s ability to self-organize and stifles creativity. This approach contradicts Scrum’s emphasis on team autonomy and empowerment, leading to disengagement.', 'option_b': 'Creating teams based solely on skill sets disregards the importance of cross-functionality. While skills are important, Scrum promotes diverse skill sets within teams to encourage collaboration and knowledge sharing.', 'option_d': 'Imposing strict roles without allowing team input can lead to resentment and a lack of ownership. This is contrary to Scrum values, which encourage flexibility and the ability for teams to define their own roles based on evolving needs.'}
Real-World Application
In a software development company, a Scrum Master facilitates a discussion among team members to define their roles based on individual strengths and project needs. They establish a framework for communication and collaboration but allow the team to self-organize, resulting in a highly motivated and cohesive Scrum Team that adapts to challenges effectively.
Common Pitfalls

Assuming that team composition should always be based on existing skills without considering team dynamics.Neglecting to involve team members in decisions about their roles leads to disengagement.Over-relying on managerial dictate rather than encouraging team self-organization.

Expert Insights

Scrum Guide Reference

Scrum Guide 2020, Section 3.2: The Scrum Team

Expert Author

SC

Sarah Chen

Certified Scrum Master & Agile Coach

Sprint ceremonies, team facilitation, impediment removal

Key Concepts

Self-organization Team autonomy Collaboration Cross-functionality Scrum values